Skip to main content

Banks in Mexico Pose Greater Money Laundering Risk Than Crypto Firms, Says Report

Banks in Mexico Pose Greater Money Laundering Risk Than Crypto Firms, Says Report

Commercial banks by far pose the greatest risk of money laundering in Mexico compared to crypto-related companies, according to a new report by the country’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU).

The study singles out what it calls the “G7 banking group”, which includes BBVA, Santander, Citibanamex, Banorte, HSBC, Scotiabank, and Inbursa, as the biggest conduits of illicit money in the South American country.

Brokerage firms and foreign exchange entities have also been flagged as “high risk”, El Economista reported.

The “G7 banking group” controls 80% of the assets within Mexico’s financial sector. However, Mexico’s second National Risk Assessment report did not provide figures for the potential loss from bank-linked money laundering activities.

Santiago Nieto Castillo, who heads the FIU, noted that the “G7 banking group” is “the most regulated sector” in the country. But even then, “multiple banking, made up of the seven largest banks in Mexico, is the sector most likely to be used to carry out money laundering operations,” he said.

Regulators throughout the world have long been suspicious that bitcoin (BTC) exchanges and other crypto companies might be liable to using their platforms to facilitate illegal financial transfers.

So, authorities have been tightening screws around anti-money laundering (AML) reporting requirements for crypto exchange operators and other blockchain companies.

In Mexico, digital asset firms must report transactions of more than $2,500 to the financial regulator, in line with AML requirements. This may be a one-time transaction or those that occur over a period of six months.

But operating a cryptocurrency business in the country requires that one pays $35,000 in licensing fees and generate up to $100,000 in profit per year, according to a new law targeting fintech companies, which came into force in 2019. The requirements reportedly sent a number of firms underground.

Now, in its latest report, Mexico’s Financial Intelligence Unit did not classify virtual assets-related risk – but that does not imply the sector is risk-free. Regulators still consider crypto susceptible to money laundering and terrorism financing, but only as an “emerging risk”.

Cryptocurrency trading is booming in Mexico thanks to a combination of a lack of public confidence in the banking sector, the promise of cheap financial transfers, and other factors.

Bitso, the country’s number one crypto exchange, has reportedly more than tripled trading volume during the eight months to May 2020. The platform now boasts over one million users, of which 92% are locals.

What do you think about banks and money laundering in Mexico? Let us know in the comments section below.

The post Banks in Mexico Pose Greater Money Laundering Risk Than Crypto Firms, Says Report appeared first on Bitcoin News.



from Bitcoin News https://ift.tt/32zSIJA

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Deep Web Roundup: Dream Adds Monero and Bitcoin Tumbler “Chip Mixer” Launches

The darknet has been quiet of late, which is the way it’s meant to be. No news means no mega busts, honeypots, or mass market shutdowns. Even when it’s out of the spotlight though, the deep web is quietly making news, whether trialling the latest privacy coins or the newest coin mixers that promise to restore a little of the privacy that’s being stripped away from bitcoin users on a daily basis. Also read: U.S. Agency ICE Conducts Investigations That Exploit Blockchain Activity The Battle for Privacy Heats Up Privacy is all relative, but of late there’s been relatively little privacy to be enjoyed by bitcoin users. Blockchain monitoring software is becoming more sophisticated and more common, with U.S. law enforcement agencies using it to profile and hunt down deep web users. Chip Mixer is a relatively new bitcoin tumbler that’s designed to restore some of that privacy. Available on both the clearnet and darknet, the service uses a variety of techniques to obfuscate blockchain m

International Crypto Exchange Luno Adds Bitcoin Cash Trading

Luno exchange has added bitcoin cash trading to the platform following feedback from its client base. BCH is now only the third cryptocurrency available for trading on the exchange, in addition to BTC and ETH , but more options could be on the way once Luno determines that they are credible enough. Also Read: Bitflyer Adds Bitcoin Cash Trading Across Europe and the US Luno Adds Bitcoin Cash Trading Luno, the London-headquartered company formerly known as Bitx, recently announced that bitcoin cash was made available on its cryptocurrency exchange. Starting from Monday, September 23, customers at Luno are now able to store, buy and sell BCH on the platform. The reason given for adding BCH to the exchange is feedback from users in developing markets that convinced Luno to expand their offering from previously just BTC and ETH . Marcus Swanepoel, CEO of Luno, said , “We are in a new and exciting financial era. Developing economies are leading the large-scale adoption and appli

Ombudsman Receives Complaints About Crypto Investments in Spain

The Spanish ombudsman has been receiving complaints about cryptocurrency and how some Spanish citizens investing in these vehicles have lost everything. In his annual report, Angel Gabilondo recognized the rise of cryptocurrencies as a new problem due to the little or no regulation crypto sees in the country. In the same way, the EU has also warned about these assets recently. Spanish Ombudsman Gives His Take on Crypto Angel Gabilondo, the Spanish ombudsman, has given his take regarding cryptocurrencies and the effects they have on citizens investing in some of these projects. Gabilondo said in his yearly report that cryptocurrencies have become “a new problem” during the year examined, with many people having lost all of their funds invested. The report states : Cryptocurrency exchange companies or platforms are not regulated in the legal system, are not subject to any public supervision system, nor do they benefit from deposit guarantee systems. The affected users that sought