Skip to main content

Africrypt Ponzi Scheme Collapse: South Africa Regulator Says Its ‘Not in a Position to Take Any Regulatory Action’

Following Africrypt’s collapse, South African regulator, the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA), released a statement asserting its lack of jurisdiction over cryptocurrencies. Although the regulator says it is “continuing to investigate complaints” against the crypto investment company, it concedes it has only “found evidence of crypto-asset transactions.”

A Large Number of Scams

While the FSCA says it’s not in a position to take any regulatory action, in a statement released June 24, 2021, the regulator uses the Ponzi scheme’s global notoriety to warn the public about the “high-risk nature of investing in crypto assets.”

Meanwhile, in addition to the FSCA’s concerns surrounding the “suitability of crypto assets as an asset class” as well as their volatility, the regulator expressed concern over “the large number of scams being perpetrated by persons purporting to provide the crypto asset to the public.” According to the FSCA, many of the crypto investment companies are in fact fraudulent operations that may be based outside South Africa. The FSCA states:

Many of these entities (which we refer to as intermediaries) are often not based in South Africa or have poor security in place to protect the crypto asset being acquired by the public, and in theory, held on behalf of the customer. Often, however, these intermediaries are just fraudulent operators.

Although the regulator concedes that the South African crypto-asset sector “has a number of legitimate players offering a legitimate service” it urges investors to remain vigilant as there is a “very large number of unscrupulous players in this sector.”

Africrypt Takes Page From MTI Playbook

In its statement, the FSCA — which is in the process of considering declaring crypto assets a financial product — says it will “continue to update the public as more information becomes available regarding Africrypt.” The statement also urges investors to “always check that an entity or individual is registered with the FSCA to provide Financial Advisory & Intermediary Services.”

Just like Mirror Trading International (MTI), which Chainalysis ranked as the biggest bitcoin scam in 2020, Africrypt collapsed after its directors disappeared with investor funds. Also like MTI, the end of Africrypt was preceded by a breach and subsequent freeze in withdrawals sometime in April 2021.

At the time, Africrypt directors Ameer Cajee and his brother Raees Cajee, told investors the breach had compromised “client accounts, wallets, and nodes.” However, in anticipation of possible legal challenges, the directors warned clients against taking the legal route as “this will only delay the recovery process.” Since the hack announcement, the Cajee brothers have disappeared and local media outlets speculate they fled to the UK.

What are your thoughts on the FSCA’s response to Africrypt’s collapse? You can share your views in the comments section below.



from Bitcoin News https://ift.tt/3vVBiDY

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Deep Web Roundup: Dream Adds Monero and Bitcoin Tumbler “Chip Mixer” Launches

The darknet has been quiet of late, which is the way it’s meant to be. No news means no mega busts, honeypots, or mass market shutdowns. Even when it’s out of the spotlight though, the deep web is quietly making news, whether trialling the latest privacy coins or the newest coin mixers that promise to restore a little of the privacy that’s being stripped away from bitcoin users on a daily basis. Also read: U.S. Agency ICE Conducts Investigations That Exploit Blockchain Activity The Battle for Privacy Heats Up Privacy is all relative, but of late there’s been relatively little privacy to be enjoyed by bitcoin users. Blockchain monitoring software is becoming more sophisticated and more common, with U.S. law enforcement agencies using it to profile and hunt down deep web users. Chip Mixer is a relatively new bitcoin tumbler that’s designed to restore some of that privacy. Available on both the clearnet and darknet, the service uses a variety of techniques to obfuscate blockchain m

International Crypto Exchange Luno Adds Bitcoin Cash Trading

Luno exchange has added bitcoin cash trading to the platform following feedback from its client base. BCH is now only the third cryptocurrency available for trading on the exchange, in addition to BTC and ETH , but more options could be on the way once Luno determines that they are credible enough. Also Read: Bitflyer Adds Bitcoin Cash Trading Across Europe and the US Luno Adds Bitcoin Cash Trading Luno, the London-headquartered company formerly known as Bitx, recently announced that bitcoin cash was made available on its cryptocurrency exchange. Starting from Monday, September 23, customers at Luno are now able to store, buy and sell BCH on the platform. The reason given for adding BCH to the exchange is feedback from users in developing markets that convinced Luno to expand their offering from previously just BTC and ETH . Marcus Swanepoel, CEO of Luno, said , “We are in a new and exciting financial era. Developing economies are leading the large-scale adoption and appli

Ombudsman Receives Complaints About Crypto Investments in Spain

The Spanish ombudsman has been receiving complaints about cryptocurrency and how some Spanish citizens investing in these vehicles have lost everything. In his annual report, Angel Gabilondo recognized the rise of cryptocurrencies as a new problem due to the little or no regulation crypto sees in the country. In the same way, the EU has also warned about these assets recently. Spanish Ombudsman Gives His Take on Crypto Angel Gabilondo, the Spanish ombudsman, has given his take regarding cryptocurrencies and the effects they have on citizens investing in some of these projects. Gabilondo said in his yearly report that cryptocurrencies have become “a new problem” during the year examined, with many people having lost all of their funds invested. The report states : Cryptocurrency exchange companies or platforms are not regulated in the legal system, are not subject to any public supervision system, nor do they benefit from deposit guarantee systems. The affected users that sought