Skip to main content

Decade-Old ‘Sleeping Bitcoins’ Awaken: $8 Million Moved From 2012 Addresses

In 2023, there’s been a marked uptick in activity from so-called ‘sleeping bitcoins’ that date back to 2012. After eight transactions totaling 520 BTC from 2012 spent four days ago, an address from 2012 moved 149.99 BTC at block height 809,204 on Sunday afternoon. The wallet, dormant for more than 11 years, began with a value of $853. Today, the cache’s value has surged to a significantly larger net worth of $3.93 million. The following day, an address established on the identical date as the prior 2012 transaction shifted 157.66 BTC in the wee hours of Monday.

Rising From the Archives: 2012 Wallets Move 307 Bitcoin

While no ‘sleeping bitcoin’ spends from 2010 or 2011 were recorded in September, there have been 19 from 2012 this month. On Sunday, September 24, 2023, at block height 809,204, the bitcoin address “1HdwP” transferred 149.99 BTC valued at $3.93 million. The funds were shifted to the bitcoin address “1LWgC,” where they remain as of this report.

The original “1HdwP” address was established on February 8, 2012, and the vintage bitcoins remained untouched for 11 years, seven months, and 16 days. On the wallet’s creation day, BTC traded at $5.69 per unit, based on historic exchange rates. By the day of the recent transfer, the stash’s value had jumped to $3.93 million.

The movement was initially detected by the blockchain parser btcparser.com, and Blockchair’s privacy tool gave the transfer a score of zero. According to Blockchair, this indicates that “identified issues are significantly endangering the privacy of the parties involved.” One of the detected vulnerabilities was address reuse, suggesting the sender utilized the same address for both receiving and change.

The next day, at block height 809,258, an address originating from February 8, 2012, transferred 157.66 BTC valued at $4.1 million. The address “1AGwm” didn’t employ any privacy measures, and Blockchair highlighted two vulnerabilities in the transaction. Both address reuse and round value outputs came to light.

The day the address from 2012 was created, the stash was worth $897. After the transfer of another batch of sleeping bitcoins from 2012 on Sunday, the year’s total from 2012 reached 5,438.46 BTC, roughly valued at $141 million.

In the four-day period between the 149.99 BTC transfer and the 520 BTC transactions, two transfers accounted for 59.19 BTC from 2015. Additionally, 15 BTC from 2016 was moved on Sept. 23. Then, on Sept. 23 and 24, three transfers totaled 139.99 BTC from 2014 wallets. Notably, 63.99 BTC of that 139.99 BTC from 2014 was transferred shortly before the 149.99 BTC transaction from 2012 at block height 809,104.

What do you think about the number of so-called sleeping bitcoin spends from 2012 transferred in September 2023? Share your thoughts and opinions about this subject in the comments section below.



from Bitcoin News https://ift.tt/U8N1IuK

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Deep Web Roundup: Dream Adds Monero and Bitcoin Tumbler “Chip Mixer” Launches

The darknet has been quiet of late, which is the way it’s meant to be. No news means no mega busts, honeypots, or mass market shutdowns. Even when it’s out of the spotlight though, the deep web is quietly making news, whether trialling the latest privacy coins or the newest coin mixers that promise to restore a little of the privacy that’s being stripped away from bitcoin users on a daily basis. Also read: U.S. Agency ICE Conducts Investigations That Exploit Blockchain Activity The Battle for Privacy Heats Up Privacy is all relative, but of late there’s been relatively little privacy to be enjoyed by bitcoin users. Blockchain monitoring software is becoming more sophisticated and more common, with U.S. law enforcement agencies using it to profile and hunt down deep web users. Chip Mixer is a relatively new bitcoin tumbler that’s designed to restore some of that privacy. Available on both the clearnet and darknet, the service uses a variety of techniques to obfuscate blockchain m

International Crypto Exchange Luno Adds Bitcoin Cash Trading

Luno exchange has added bitcoin cash trading to the platform following feedback from its client base. BCH is now only the third cryptocurrency available for trading on the exchange, in addition to BTC and ETH , but more options could be on the way once Luno determines that they are credible enough. Also Read: Bitflyer Adds Bitcoin Cash Trading Across Europe and the US Luno Adds Bitcoin Cash Trading Luno, the London-headquartered company formerly known as Bitx, recently announced that bitcoin cash was made available on its cryptocurrency exchange. Starting from Monday, September 23, customers at Luno are now able to store, buy and sell BCH on the platform. The reason given for adding BCH to the exchange is feedback from users in developing markets that convinced Luno to expand their offering from previously just BTC and ETH . Marcus Swanepoel, CEO of Luno, said , “We are in a new and exciting financial era. Developing economies are leading the large-scale adoption and appli

Ombudsman Receives Complaints About Crypto Investments in Spain

The Spanish ombudsman has been receiving complaints about cryptocurrency and how some Spanish citizens investing in these vehicles have lost everything. In his annual report, Angel Gabilondo recognized the rise of cryptocurrencies as a new problem due to the little or no regulation crypto sees in the country. In the same way, the EU has also warned about these assets recently. Spanish Ombudsman Gives His Take on Crypto Angel Gabilondo, the Spanish ombudsman, has given his take regarding cryptocurrencies and the effects they have on citizens investing in some of these projects. Gabilondo said in his yearly report that cryptocurrencies have become “a new problem” during the year examined, with many people having lost all of their funds invested. The report states : Cryptocurrency exchange companies or platforms are not regulated in the legal system, are not subject to any public supervision system, nor do they benefit from deposit guarantee systems. The affected users that sought