Skip to main content

Insiders Say SEC Deems Blackrocks Spot Bitcoin ETF and Other Applications as Inadequate

Insiders Say SEC Deems Blackrock's Spot Bitcoin ETF and Other Applications as Inadequate

According to a report citing “people familiar with the matter,” the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has allegedly informed Nasdaq and Cboe that Blackrock’s registration for a bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) and the multitude of other spot bitcoin ETF applications currently in progress are considered inadequate.

SEC Reportedly Finds Flaw in the Latest Slew of Spot Bitcoin ETF Applications

Following Blackrock’s submission of an application for a spot bitcoin ETF to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), numerous companies swiftly followed suit and filed their own registrations for similar products. Despite the SEC’s approval of bitcoin futures ETFs, including a newly authorized leveraged option, the regulatory body has thus far refrained from granting approval to spot bitcoin ETFs.

According to insiders cited by Vicky Ge Huang of the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), the latest registrations submitted including Blackrock’s ETF are reported to fall short of meeting the SEC’s rigorous standards.

The SEC has reportedly revealed that the submitted applications for the ETFs are deemed inadequate, the WSJ report discloses. Allegedly, the SEC has communicated this to both Nasdaq and Cboe, the two firms responsible for filing the ETF registrations on behalf of Fidelity and Blackrock.

While a spokeswoman from Cboe informed the WSJ that they intend to revise and resubmit the registration to meet the SEC’s requirements, Nasdaq declined to comment, as disclosed by the reporter on Friday. As per the sources cited in Ge Huang’s report, “the filings aren’t sufficiently clear and comprehensive.”

An array of firms, including Blackrock, Bitwise, Valkyrie, Invesco, Fidelity, Ark Investment, and Wisdomtree, have already submitted their filings, signaling the growing interest in spot bitcoin ETFs.

Additionally, Grayscale Investments, the largest manager of digital currency assets worldwide, has been striving to transform the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust into a spot bitcoin ETF. However, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rejected Grayscale’s application, prompting the firm to take legal action against the regulatory body.

The SEC’s decision-making process sheds light on their concerns regarding market manipulation. When the SEC denied the Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust last year, they cited the inability to “prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts” or “protect investors” as the primary reasons for the denial.

What are your thoughts on the SEC’s stance towards spot Bitcoin ETFs and their concerns about market manipulation? Share your thoughts and opinions about this subject in the comments section below.



from Bitcoin News https://ift.tt/Il0eBW1

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mt Gox Creditors Updated, Trustee Says Rehabilitation Custodian Is ‘Currently Preparing to Make Repayments’

On August 31, 2022, the Mt Gox trustee Nobuaki Kobayashi explained in a recent letter that the rehabilitation custodian is “currently preparing to make repayments” to Mt Gox creditors. Trustee Updates Mt Gox Creditors — Repayment Date and Exchange Still Unknown Last week speculation and rumors concerning the release of 140K bitcoin ( BTC ) from Mt Gox littered social media platforms and headlines. Bitcoin.com News covered the situation six days ago as a number of people and Mt Gox creditors called the rumors “ fake news .” During that same period of time, a bitcoin whale transferred 10,000 BTC to unknown wallets, and a 2018 annotation , heuristics, and clustering methods show the funds likely originated from the June 2011 Mt Gox hacks. Following the mysterious whale transfer, last Wednesday, Mt Gox published an official update from the court trustee Nobuaki Kobayashi that explains the court is “currently preparing to make repayments” to creditors. Mt Gox creditors have been wait...

Economists Discuss Russia, China Potentially Developing Gold-Backed Currency That Could Undermine US Dollar

Economists have weighed in on reports that China and Russia may be developing a new gold-backed currency that could undermine the U.S. dollar’s status as the world’s primary reserve currency. Russia and China May Be Developing Gold-Backed Currency Several experts have shared their views on Russia and China potentially creating a new gold-baked currency, Fox Business reported Saturday, emphasizing that China has been buying up huge quantities of gold while Russia was forced off the U.S. dollar due to sanctions imposed on the country following its invasion of Ukraine. The news outlet noted that some experts have cautioned that these moves, along with the closer relationship that has developed between Moscow and Beijing, point to the likelihood of China attempting to launch a gold-backed currency. However, neither Russia nor China has officially confirmed plans for such a currency. Craig Singleton, senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and a former U.S. diplomat,...

Fidelity Discusses Bitcoin as Portfolio Insurance — Could Soon Stand in ‘Stark Contrast’ to Path Fiat Currencies Take

Fidelity Digital Assets, a subsidiary of Fidelity Investments, says that bitcoin could be considered portfolio insurance. The firm notes that the cryptocurrency “may soon stand in stark contrast to the path that the rest of the world and fiat currencies may take — namely the path of increased supply, additional currency creation, and central bank balance sheet expansion.” Fidelity Says Bitcoin Could Be Portfolio Insurance Fidelity Digital Assets, a subsidiary of Fidelity Investments, recently published a research study titled “The Rising Dollar and Bitcoin.” The research outlines “how bitcoin could be considered portfolio insurance” as the rising dollar impacts global currency markets. “The strengthening U.S. dollar is wreaking havoc among other countries and may put pressure on the Federal Reserve to soon reverse its tightening monetary actions, something that has precedent based on 1985’s Plaza Accord,” Fidelity explained. In addition, “more monetary debasement may be needed to ...