Skip to main content

Gemini Challenges SEC Lawsuit on Lending Program, Pushes for Oral Hearing

Gemini Challenges SEC Lawsuit on Lending Program, Pushes for Oral Hearing

Lawyers for cryptocurrency exchange Gemini have filed a motion seeking to dismiss a lawsuit brought against it by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over its Gemini Earn lending program. In the motion, Gemini argues the SEC has failed to plausibly allege that any securities laws were violated.

Gemini Moves to Dismiss SEC Claims, Advocates for Oral Argument

Earlier this year, the SEC accused Gemini and its associate, Genesis Global Capital, of illicitly offering and vending unregistered securities via the Gemini Earn program. According to the SEC, both the program’s Master Digital Asset Loan Agreement and the program itself were unregistered securities unlawfully offered and sold.

Gemini, however, has fired back in its motion to dismiss which seeks an oral hearing. The firm challenges the SEC’s inability to provide evidence of actual “sales” of securities — a crucial component to prove a violation of the Securities Act.

Gemini emphasizes that the SEC’s allegations are ambiguous about when, how, or to whom these supposed securities sales happened. Furthermore, they question if any transactions concerning the loan agreement or lending scheme were ever exchanged “for value,” a vital aspect of what defines a securities sale.

The motion underscores that the SEC seems to be merely highlighting loans under the program instead of actual securities sales. It insists there’s a lack of concrete evidence suggesting any transfer of interests in the loan contract or the program. Just because something could be deemed a security, Gemini retorts, doesn’t indicate a Securities Act breach in the absence of specific sales events.

Furthermore, Gemini points out inconsistencies in the SEC’s stance. The SEC sometimes labels the loan agreement as the security while elsewhere it suggests the entire lending program is. Gemini underlines this blurred distinction as a critical flaw in the SEC’s case.

The dismissal motion stresses the SEC’s oversight in detailing sale conditions, pricing strategies, ownership transfers, or other markers pointing to real sales. Gemini asserts that the SEC is blurring the lines between proving a security’s existence and showing actual transaction evidence.

Based on civil procedure principles and statutory interpretation norms, Gemini pushes for a dismissal. They argue that the SEC’s claims lack plausibility and emphasize that the court should stick to the statute’s clear language, which Gemini believes hasn’t been fulfilled. The exchange already pushed for a dismissal at the end of May after Gemini co-founder, Tyler Winklevoss, called the SEC’s enforcement lawsuit “super lame.”

What do you think about Gemini’s move to dismiss the SEC lawsuit? Share your thoughts and opinions about this subject in the comments section below.



from Bitcoin News https://ift.tt/uRpOYMD

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mt Gox Creditors Updated, Trustee Says Rehabilitation Custodian Is ‘Currently Preparing to Make Repayments’

On August 31, 2022, the Mt Gox trustee Nobuaki Kobayashi explained in a recent letter that the rehabilitation custodian is “currently preparing to make repayments” to Mt Gox creditors. Trustee Updates Mt Gox Creditors — Repayment Date and Exchange Still Unknown Last week speculation and rumors concerning the release of 140K bitcoin ( BTC ) from Mt Gox littered social media platforms and headlines. Bitcoin.com News covered the situation six days ago as a number of people and Mt Gox creditors called the rumors “ fake news .” During that same period of time, a bitcoin whale transferred 10,000 BTC to unknown wallets, and a 2018 annotation , heuristics, and clustering methods show the funds likely originated from the June 2011 Mt Gox hacks. Following the mysterious whale transfer, last Wednesday, Mt Gox published an official update from the court trustee Nobuaki Kobayashi that explains the court is “currently preparing to make repayments” to creditors. Mt Gox creditors have been wait...

Economists Discuss Russia, China Potentially Developing Gold-Backed Currency That Could Undermine US Dollar

Economists have weighed in on reports that China and Russia may be developing a new gold-backed currency that could undermine the U.S. dollar’s status as the world’s primary reserve currency. Russia and China May Be Developing Gold-Backed Currency Several experts have shared their views on Russia and China potentially creating a new gold-baked currency, Fox Business reported Saturday, emphasizing that China has been buying up huge quantities of gold while Russia was forced off the U.S. dollar due to sanctions imposed on the country following its invasion of Ukraine. The news outlet noted that some experts have cautioned that these moves, along with the closer relationship that has developed between Moscow and Beijing, point to the likelihood of China attempting to launch a gold-backed currency. However, neither Russia nor China has officially confirmed plans for such a currency. Craig Singleton, senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and a former U.S. diplomat,...

Fidelity Discusses Bitcoin as Portfolio Insurance — Could Soon Stand in ‘Stark Contrast’ to Path Fiat Currencies Take

Fidelity Digital Assets, a subsidiary of Fidelity Investments, says that bitcoin could be considered portfolio insurance. The firm notes that the cryptocurrency “may soon stand in stark contrast to the path that the rest of the world and fiat currencies may take — namely the path of increased supply, additional currency creation, and central bank balance sheet expansion.” Fidelity Says Bitcoin Could Be Portfolio Insurance Fidelity Digital Assets, a subsidiary of Fidelity Investments, recently published a research study titled “The Rising Dollar and Bitcoin.” The research outlines “how bitcoin could be considered portfolio insurance” as the rising dollar impacts global currency markets. “The strengthening U.S. dollar is wreaking havoc among other countries and may put pressure on the Federal Reserve to soon reverse its tightening monetary actions, something that has precedent based on 1985’s Plaza Accord,” Fidelity explained. In addition, “more monetary debasement may be needed to ...